1. On September 15, 2015, the Defendant issued a disposition of business suspension against the Plaintiff from September 22, 2015 to October 1, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 25, 2015, the Plaintiff registered the business of providing Internet computer game facilities with the trade name of 201, 202, 203, and 204, 612-gil 16, as Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and operated juvenile game providing business.

(hereinafter referred to as the "place of business") of this case. B.

The Plaintiff registered the place of business as 421.92 square meters when filing for the registration of the said game facility business. On May 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) visited the instant place of business to detect the expansion of 36.88 square meters in the area of the place of business by using the hallway (36.88 square meters) as the entrance of the instant place of business; and (b) on the same day, the Plaintiff issued an order to report the alteration of the business area to the effect that “the area used as the inner place of business within the entrance of the entrance by June 10, 2015” was confirmed to have been 421.92 square meters in the place of business recorded at the time of filing for registration as 36.8 square meters in excess of 36.8 square meters in the place of business; and (c) on the same day, the Plaintiff was ordered to report the alteration of the area under Article 19 of the Enforcement Rule of the Game Industry Promotion Act (hereinafter “Game Business Promotion Act”).

C. On June 10, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) issued an order to report the change of the content that changed the area of the instant place of business from 421.92 square meters to 458.8 square meters; (b) on June 5, 2015, the previous owner of the free economic zone, the Defendant changed the area to the effect that, on June 5, 2015, the head of the Incheon Metropolitan City, the head of the relevant free economic zone authority should implement the procedures for changing the use of the instant place of business to sales facilities or take measures to reduce the area of the place of business of the second class neighborhood living facilities, including the area for common use; and (c) received “written opinions related to civil petitions against illegal buildings arising from illegal occupancy of the shared area” and on June 12, 2015, the Plaintiff changed the area to the effect that it would change the purpose of use or the area suitable for the change of the area.