(C)The revocation and entrustment of recognition and the revocation of recognition restriction;

A

Law Firm Tae-tae et al.

Attorney Choi Yong-hwan

The Director General of the Busan Regional Employment and Labor Office

Changwon District Court Decision 2018Gudan12351 Decided June 5, 2019

September 25, 2019

October 30, 2019

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The revocation of the authorization made by the Defendant on August 31, 2018 by the Plaintiff on August 31, 2018, and both the entrustment and recognition restriction disposition and the recognition restriction disposition are revoked during the three-month period.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is the same as the part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's findings and determination of the court of first instance that accepted it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the ground for appeal by the plaintiff is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and even when considering the evidence (Evidence A No. 14) added in the plaintiff's argument and the trial, it can be recognized that "the plaintiff was able to recognize that he was able to receive training fees by treating D by a false appearance without attendance in the training," and "the degree of denial of this case's disposition is too serious."

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Application to the presiding judge;

Judges Lee Jin-jin

Judges Seo-chul