A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury to Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving B-learning automobiles.

On February 2, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car at around 18:20, and proceeded along the four-lane prior to the “Fyeong-dong Tri-dong” located in Pyeong-dong at Pyeongyang-si, Namyang-si, according to the four-lane direction in the direction of Feng-dong in the direction of Feng-dong.

There are three-distance crossings, and one-lanes of driving C(39 years of age) of the victim C were waiting according to the stop signal of signal apparatus at an intersection, so the defendant had a duty of care to avoid collision with a vehicle under stop on the opposite part.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected it while under the influence of alcohol and neglected it, and neglected to operate the steering gear accurately, caused the Defendant’s negligence in the course of duty to shock the driving of the driver’s vehicle in front of the driver’s vehicle in front of the driver’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant driven the above-learning car in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and suffered injury, such as salt pans, tensions, etc., which requires two-day medical treatment, to the victim.

2. On February 2, 2020, at the same place as Paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act around 18:40 on February 2, 2020, the Defendant was required to comply with the measurement of alcohol by inserting alcohol in such a way that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as a breath of the Gyeongginam Police Station Emba, which was dispatched to the scene after receiving 112 reports due to the foregoing traffic accidents, on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as a breath and a breath of the flow distance, etc., and that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol.

Nevertheless, the defendant is able to take a bath, such as "profes", against the F.