(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.09.18 2015고단713

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.09.18 2015고단713

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are the defendants engaged in driving motor vehicles B;

On February 15, 2015, at around 06:35, the Defendant proceeded one lane in front of the D cafeteria located in Pyeongtaek-si C, along with about 30 km in the direction of the Gero Children Park in the direction of the Gero Children Park.

At the time, in front of the defendant's driving direction, the E-learning car and the F low-speed car have been parked consecutively, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by properly manipulating the front and the left and right of the driver of the vehicle and properly manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a vehicle at the front time while driving the vehicle due to his negligence and caused the Defendant to drive the vehicle at the right end of the vehicle, and caused the said vehicle to be pushed ahead of the said vehicle due to his shock, and caused the said vehicle to be pushed ahead of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above-mentioned occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim G (the 52 years old), who was on the driver’s seat of the said high-speed car, due to the light fluenite, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, the Defendant did not stop immediately to the extent that the 2,617,866 won, such as the exchange of the front fluor, were damaged, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (free license) driving of the said vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accident site photographs;

1. The corresponding Article of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

참조조문

-도로교통법

-특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.03.27 2014고단197

-대구지방법원 영덕지원 2021.04.28 2020고단318

-의정부지방법원 2020.10.13 2020고단1411

-수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.03.30 2014고단1005

-수원지방법원 2019.01.30 2018고단6974