Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for eight months, respectively.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants, in collusion with E, etc. of unspecified personal information on October 2014, the Defendants, including public electronic records, conspiredd to arbitrarily dispose of the instant real estate in a manner that, by using the fact that the F’s resident registration number was not indicated in the column for ownership transfer registration, Defendant A (K prior to the name of the instant real estate), and Defendant A (K prior to the name of the instant real estate owner)’s name and pretended to be the owner of the instant real estate in a manner that, by using the fact that Defendant A and Dong name were not indicated in the column for ownership transfer registration with respect to the instant real estate owned by the F.

Defendant

B around October 2014, Defendant A, a document necessary for the voluntary disposal under Defendant A’s name, delivered to E the abstract of the resident registration of Defendant A, and Defendant A, a new name, issued by the owner of the instant real estate. On January 30, 2015, Defendant A was not the owner of the instant real estate at the Suwon District Court, Suwon District Court, which was located in 7, Sungwon-ro, Sungwon-ro, the wife population of the Republic of Korea. However, Defendant A was not the owner of the instant real estate on January 30, 2015, a certified judicial scrivener who is well aware of such fact, submitted a document for filing an application for the registration of transfer of ownership due to sale on December 18, 201

As a result, the Defendants conspired with E, etc. to have an employee in charge of the above registry office complete the registration of transfer of ownership in the M name of the real estate of this case, and made a false report to the public official, thereby recording false facts in the electronic records same as the register of real estate which is the original copy of the

2. On January 30, 2015, the Defendants conspired with E, etc. to use the electronic records, such as the electronic records recorded as false, by having the above-mentioned registry office keep the same electronic records as the instant real estate register, in which such false facts were recorded.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness F ( complainant), N,O, M, and P;

1. The witness A (Defendant)’s partial statement.