Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Crimes related to D related to limited companies;

A. On August 10, 2015, Defendant A sent a copy of his/her resident registration card, seal impression certificate, copy of his/her identification card, and seal impression certificate to the “G” office located on the third floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building around August 10, 2015.

In addition, the request for the registration of incorporation of a limited company was made by proxy, and the defendant E remitted the expenses for the registration of incorporation to the G Certified Judicial Scriveners Office.

The staff of the G Certified Judicial Scriveners Office prepared a false document necessary for filing an application for registration of incorporation of a limited company under the name of Defendant A, including the D Articles of incorporation, a written appointment of directors, a certificate of seal impression, an individual report, a receipt of investment, and a letter of delegation for registration. On August 19, 2015, the Suwon District Court as the court of Gyeonggi City, which was 65, submitted a false document to the registration public official who was aware of the fact that the receipt of investment was false, as seen above, as if he were to establish a limited company D.

However, the fact that there was no contribution from the above corporation.

Accordingly, the above registry official entered “D” in the commercial registry computer system, which is an electronic record identical to the commercial registry, “D” in the same electronic records as the commercial registry, “H, 764-2 head office in Gyeonggi-do, “5,000 won” in the total amount of capital, “10,000,000 won” in the total amount of capital, “10,000,000,000” in the computer system, and stored and operated a commercial electronic information processing system, which includes false facts, immediately.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false report to the public official to record the false facts in the same electronic record as the original copy of the fair deed, and to store and operate the same electronic record as the commercial register in which the false facts are recorded.

B. Defendant A’s violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.