Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 10, 2017, the injured Defendant, in Jeju Island No. 03:20 on May 10, 2017, filed a dispute over the job placement in the victim D (n, 36 years of age) and E and the second floor of E and the second floor in the stairs of the Co., Ltd., with the victim D who fighted between E and the Defendant, expressed his/her desire to “non-flon”, and had the victim go beyond the bottom of the stairs by pushing the victim, and then sent the victim to the hospital, thereby causing the victim to suffer injury, such as the victim’s salt, high-water salt, etc. requiring medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant, at the above time and time, abused the victim, such as booming the flaps of the victim E (36 tax) that d’s flaps, booming the flaps.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Diagnosis statement, investigation report (the use of telephone, the confirmation of the witness F counterpart fact), investigation report (the contents of telephone conversations G with the shots);

1. Application of statutes on the photograph of the case

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act concerning the custody of the workhouse (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel did not smuggling like the criminal facts or e-brobbial bat.

The victims were consistently and specifically stated in the investigative agency from the investigative agency to this court, and the witness F was unable to directly witness the scene of the assault, but the defendant was unable to have the people around the year when the police was about to escape before the visit.

The statement(2/38 pages of investigation record), although the defendant asserts that the victim D was beyond himself, the victim does not seem to have been behind the victim's stairs to cover the charge. G, a witness, is the defendant and the victim E.