logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.08.14 2014고단1391
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On November 28, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on October 28, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 6, 2012, and is still under probation.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around March 28, 2014, around 09:30 on March 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) the victim E (year 14) who locked himself/herself within Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “Durur” 201 was fluenced one time to drink the victim’s head on the ground that the victim E (year 14) was fluenced with a fake.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. The Defendant, at around 11:00 on the same day as indicated in paragraph (1), received a report of E- 112 as criminal facts on the same day, and received a voluntary request for a motion from G in the circumstances surrounding the F District at the Seoul Seongbuk Police Station, which was dispatched to the said place, and was accompanied by G to the F District located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H.

The defendant signed the FJ's voluntary behavior letter from G within the FJ zone, and received a request from G to prepare the written statement, and the defendant stated the name of the defendant I in the signature column of the above voluntary behavior written consent, and signed it next to it, signed it, written the written statement, and signed it.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged the I's signature for the purpose of exercising.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), submitted a written consent and a written consent stating the forged I’s signature to G as if they were genuinely formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Voluntary written consent (misappropriation in the name of I) and written consent (misappropriation in the name of I);

1. Previous records: Criminal records and application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Article 239 (1) and (2), and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow