logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.10.21 2015고단1446
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-offenders are as follows: (a) the Defendants’ co-offenders are friendly to the company code.

Defendant

A around 22:00 on May 29, 2015, at the E parking lot located in Suwon-gu, Busan, a police officer who was seated in another person’s vehicle, and received a 112 report in relation to the act of assaulting him from F, the parking manager, and the police officer belonging to the Busan Southern Police Station G District in Busan, the police officer of the Busan, who was called in order to arrest him as an offender in the act of committing an act of assaulted the above police officer at one time, and the police officer of the same police officer, who was the police officer of the above police officer, tried to arrest him in the act of committing an act of violence, the police officer of the above police officer, who was sent to the scene, and the police officer of the above police officer, taken the above police officer’s body in parallel with the police officer of the police officer of the police officer of the police officer of the police station of Busan, on one occasion.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest and investigation of the above police officers.

2. 피고인 A 피고인은 같은 날 23:10경 부산 수영구 K에 있는 G지구대에서, 위와 같은 이유로 현행범 체포되어온 후 피고인의 난동으로 인한 지구대 경찰관들의 지원요청으로 위 지구대에 출동한 부산남부경찰서 형사과 L 소속 경찰관인 경위 M(54세)가 피고인을 경찰서로 연행하기 위해 형사기동차량에 태우려고 하자 “내가 뭘 잘못했는데, 내가 왜 타야 하는데”라고 고함을 치면서 이빨로 위 경위 M의 오른팔 이두근 부위를 물어뜯었다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of flagrant offenders of M in the past M, and at the same time, the defendant placed on the top part of the sale franchis that requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. F, H, I, J.

arrow