logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.07.10 2014고단1825
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s injury to Defendant A at around 01:0 on December 31, 2013, at the main point of “G 4’s Mag of the Ildong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City F building”, Defendant A, under the influence of alcohol, she was the victim E (36 years of age) who was a guest while she was faced with his/her body in the instant main shop where he/she was under the influence of alcohol, and the victim E (36 years of age) who was faced with his/her body while she was under the influence of alcohol, she tried to examine the floor of Defendant A’s injury on his/her hand by checking the floor of Defendant A with his/her body cut over one time and pushed his/her body for 28 days.

2. Defendant B committed assault against Defendant B’s victim E with the victim’s head one time during the dispute with H and the victim E (the age of 36) on the grounds that H reported at the above date, time, place, and reason that H reported to the police.

3. At around 01:20 on the same day, Defendants A and B interfered with the performance of official duties were placed at the places described in paragraph (1), and the J (53 years of age) and K (27 years of age, a police officer belonging to the Hansan Police Station I district, who was called upon 112 reported and dispatched. Defendant A had the face of J one time with a bad hand, knife his head, so that he can go beyond the floor by shicking the body of J and K, and the body of J and K is pushed up by hand, and Defendant B has spadded, shicked with a hand, and plicked with J and K with a hand.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on 112 reported processing work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement by the prosecution against E, H, J, and K;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, respectively;

arrow