The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Around 19:40 on March 20, 2015, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim on the electric car of the means of public transportation in a way that the victim’s right knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife kn

2. Determination

A. The facts constituting an offense prosecuted in a criminal trial must be proven by the prosecutor, and the judge should be found guilty with evidence having probative value, which leads to the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant, it is inevitable to determine it with the benefit of the defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2002Do5662 delivered on December 24, 2002, etc.). B.

Defendant

In addition, since the defense counsel consistently asserted that he did not commit an indecent act against E at an investigative agency up to this court, considering the following circumstances, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the defendant committed an indecent act against E, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

1) 우선 E은 수사기관 및 이 법정에서 이 사건 공소사실에 부합하는 듯한 진술을 한 바 있다. 그러나 ① E도 진술한 바와 같이 이 사건 당시 전동차 안은 “움직일 수 없을 정도로” 혼잡하였던 점, ② E의 진술은 대체로 “엉덩이 부위에 대한 접촉으로 기분이 나빴다”라는 점에 있어서는 일관되고 구체적이지만 당시의 느낌, 추행 행위라 확신하게 된 경위, 피고인을 특정하게 된 경위 등에 대한 진술은 다소 불명확할 뿐만 아니라 불확실한 기억과 추측에 기초한 것으로 볼 여지가 있는 점(피해자는 처음에는 스친 것으로 생각하였는데 경찰관의 이야기를 듣고...