Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, it is against the Defendants for one year from the date when this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants heard that the injured party would dispose of the goods located in the said G office from those who worked in the (State)G operated by the injured party F in Silung-si, who had not been paid wages from those who worked in the said G office, and conspired to steals the valuable home appliances in the said factory without knowledge of the injured party.

On March 27, 2015, at around 15:30 on March 27, 2015, the Defendants visited the above (ju)G office, and had three air conditioners, one air cleaner, one water purifier, one air conditioners, one air conditioners, four computers, one composite credit cooperative, one compacters, and one compacters outside the office.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to state the statement of each police interrogation protocol to H and I;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. The lower limit of the sentence for mitigation area of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution against general property (the scope of punishment for sentencing in Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act) (the scope of punishment for general larceny in Article 62(1) is to be mitigated: (a) the lower limit of the sentence for which punishment is not to be imposed; (b) six months have shown the attitude of the Defendants to recognize and reflect the instant crime; and (c) the victims did not want to be punished by the Defendants; and (d) there are circumstances that may be considered in the course of committing the crime by disposing of the goods left behind in the situation where the Defendants did not receive the benefits from the victims; and (b) the execution of the

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.