logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2013.10.17 2013고단205
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the employee A violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management authority by loading and operating the freight to exceed the limit on the reduction of the B vehicle and the total weight on the road in front of the traffic patrol site located in the 479-dong 479 Sin-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, by around January 12, 1994.

However, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995) which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged retroactively loses its effect according to the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality on Dec. 29, 201.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow