logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2013.10.17 2013고단114
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the defendant's employee Gap's act violated the restriction on vehicle operation of the road management authority by loading the freight to exceed the limit load and total weight on the road in front of the patrol site of the efficulous effic effic effic effic effic effic effic effic effic effic effic effic

However, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995) which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged retroactively loses its effect according to the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality on Dec. 29, 201.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow