logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.13 2015가단128895
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff A in KRW 9,615,384, Plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F, respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 16, 2013, H driven an I Poter Cargo (hereinafter referred to as “AW”) around 12:00, and changed the two-lane line from the front side of K in theJ in Dongducheon-si, the two-lane line was changed from August 16, 2013 to the bank of Dongducheon-cheon Civil Community Center.

B. In such cases, a driver engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely change the course by accurately controlling the steering gear after checking the conditions of the motor vehicle that is driven prior to a change of course and checking the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

C. Nevertheless, H neglected his/her duty to change the tea line as it is and instead proceeded with the back part of L Driving Malba (hereinafter “damage Oalba”) running along the two-lanes in front of the direction of the vehicle driving in the case of his/her negligence, which led to the front part of the LOba (hereinafter “damage Oalba”).

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

L died of pulmonary paralysis due to the instant accident on September 12, 2013, which was being hospitalized due to the instant accident, and was being hospitalized.

E. Meanwhile, L was aged 7 years and 77 years of age at the time of the instant accident, and L was suffering from respiratory diseases, such as flat tent, and high blood pressure.

F. Plaintiff A is the spouse of L, and Plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F are L’s children. Defendant G is the sole heir of H (Death before the instant lawsuit was filed, July 26, 2015) and Defendant Mmerz fire marine insurance company (hereinafter “Defendant insurance company”) is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract regarding the instant vehicle.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute; Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 8-10; Eul evidence Nos. 1-3 (including branch numbers, if any); the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (i) The Plaintiffs are treated as hospitalized treatment due to the instant accident.

arrow