The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaged in driving of Crocketing Passenger Vehicles.

around 07:51 on November 20, 2012, the Defendant is driving along one lane a two-lane road in front of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seocho-gu Seocho-gu alternateal Street.

The left turn was going to the right of the Southern Terminal.

Since the location is an intersection with a signal apparatus, the driver has a duty of care to drive a vehicle in accordance with the signals of the signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, in violation of this, the Defendant is entering the intersection with the yellow ray prior to entering the intersection.

On the front side of the E-wheeled Automobile in the victim D (ma, 70 years old) driving, which is driven by two lanes of two lanes in the direction of the shift direction in the south side of the terminal, the driver had the victim near the left side of the passenger car of the defendant.

The Defendant suffered, due to the above occupational negligence, the victim suffered a mination of flag of flag of flag, which requires approximately twenty (20) weeks of treatment.

2. The defendant confirmed that the left-hand turn signal before entering the intersection of the accident at the time of the accident, and argued that the defendant did not violate the signal since he entered the said intersection.

3. Determination

A. The following circumstances are acknowledged based on each of the evidence submitted by the circumstantial prosecutor, the Defendant’s partial statement, the witness D, and F’s partial statement, which correspond to the facts charged, namely, the victim D, as indicated in the facts charged, consistently stated to the effect that “the victim D, who was waiting in the atmosphere according to the red signal prior to entering the intersection of the accident but was faced with the instant accident” from the investigation stage to the present court, was consistently stated to the effect that “the green signal was launched after the arrival of the signal prior to entering the intersection of the accident,” and ② the Defendant was waiting according to the red signal prior to entering the intersection of the accident of this case, rather than entering the intersection of this case.