1. The defendant, on November 11, 200, against the plaintiff A, KRW 1,00,00 for each of the above amounts and KRW 78,128,289, and the plaintiff B and C.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) D is about 06:00 on November 11, 2009, E-si for business use (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(B) A driving a vehicle and driving a road near the alternate distance in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Seocho-gu, along the four-lanes from the south side to the south side terminal room, along the four-lanes of the two-lanes, and the Plaintiff was injured by a part of the front part of the Plaintiff’s non-registered motorcycle of the Plaintiff’s driving, which was driven by green signal one-lane in the direction of the side of the Defendant vehicle, in order to yield the right of way to the rear side by the red signal before entering the intersection (hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff caused the injury of the part of the Plaintiff’s non-registered motorcycle of the Plaintiff’s driving, which was driven by the green signal one-lane in the front side of the front side of the Defendant vehicle to the rear side of the front side of the vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap's statements (including each number), Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 14, and 15, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as a mutual aid business operator of defendant vehicle.

C. The limitation of liability, however, in light of the fact that the plaintiff A sustained an injury on the face of his own, the above plaintiff appears to have been negligent at the time of the accident of this case, and such negligence is deemed to have caused the expansion of the damage of this case, so the defendant's liability is limited to 90% by taking account of this, since the above negligence is deemed to

(10% of the above plaintiff's negligence ratio) 2. In addition to the items separately stated below the scope of liability for damages, the corresponding items of the attached Table of calculation of damages shall be the same as the corresponding items of the attached Table of calculation of damages, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis.