A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 28, 2013, the Defendant, at around 22:20 on June 28, 2013, had a book with his family in front of the Daejeon Seodong D apartment 912, Dongdong 802, the Defendant stated that the victim E (the age of 49) residing in the above apartment 912, Dong 802, opened a window and opened the window at the latest night of the Defendant’s child at the latest night, and that the Defendant’s claim was defective, “Ise two ma, Ise., Ise., Ise., Ise., after our four senger test, Ise., Ise., Ise., Is off.”

We see whether the sound of the test is a flaze, and since N. N. D. M., I am h. R. L. L.W. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W.

"One hand" refers to "the face of the victim E, after being pushed into a dubbage of the victim E, 3 times the face of the above E in drinking, and 49 years the face of the victim F (the age of 49) who restrains this.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim E to suffer approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and caused the victim F to suffer from the snow grass and the impairment of gree around snow that require approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Part of the witness C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Considering the following grounds for sentencing)

1. The defense counsel's assertion on probation and community service order Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code argues that although the defendant assaulted E in the process of physical fighting with E, it constitutes legitimate self-defense as it is for the purpose of defending against the attack of E, and that F and C do not have any time.

First of all, according to each evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the defendant's family member is responsible for the surrounding area of the apartment, E is the reason that the defendant's child remains.