A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On May 15, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Activities in the Support for the Nanwon of Nanwon and completed the execution of the sentence on December 15, 201.

1. On July 2013, the Defendant: (a) the Victim P, known through the Internet hosting site, operated the F club in the City interest.

It indicated the sense of responsibility, such as the subject of responsibility, divorce, and divorce, and the phrase "Ara," and accessed the victim.

A. On July 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around July 21, 2013, the Defendant extended money to the victim to the Plaintiff for a music heading store after the day of lending the money to the Plaintiff.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant did not have any special occupation or income at the time, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party with a debt of 57 million won in Seoul Guarantee Insurance, etc., he did not have any intention or ability to complete payment.

The Defendant received KRW 1,300,000,000 from the damaged party to the post office account (number Q) in the name of the Defendant, on July 21, 2013; KRW 200,000 on July 26, 2013; and KRW 1,30,000,000 on July 27, 2013.

B. On July 29, 2013, the Defendant concluded that “A traffic accident occurred and the Defendant borrowed money from the victim.” However, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay even if he/she did not have any traffic accident nor borrowed money from the victim.

The Defendant received from the victimized party a total of KRW 6.9 million from the post office account (number Q) in the name of the Defendant, to KRW 4 million on July 29, 2013, and KRW 2.9 million on August 12, 2013.

(c)

On September 2013, the defendant extended the credit card to the victim with no cost of inserting oil due to lack of funds, and then returned the card at the time of completion of the contract, and repaid the amount used.

“Along with the falsity, there was no intention or ability to repay the card price to the victim as above.”

The defendant shall belong to the injured party.