logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.01.31 2017고단2517
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On August 29, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court on August 8, 2013, and was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court on August 8, 2013, and completed the execution of the final sentence at the Busan Western District Court on November 15, 2014. On October 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Western District Court and ten months of imprisonment for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 4, 2016.

[2] The Defendant, who was a person with a relationship with the victim B, had repeated criminal acts of fraud from around 2010 to the date of release from the Seoul detention center on May 14, 2016. As such, the Defendant had the awareness that there was no special property or revenue from around March 2015, the time of the instant case, with the awareness that he had been engaged in business abroad, and had the intent to receive money from the victim as if he had been married with the victim.

1. On March 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered into an office contract with the victim at a place in which a police officer was not a police officer in the middle of 2015; and (b) entered into an officetel contract

different types.

“The Defendant did not enter into a contract for the foregoing officetels,” but the Defendant did not enter into any other contract.

Around April 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; and (b) transferred KRW 18,400,000 to the account in the name of Nonghyup Bank (D) in the name of an officetel deposit from the victim; (c) around April 6, 2015.

2. On March 24, 2015, the Defendant did not use the money in cash for the head of the Party because the money needed to urgently operate the project from the victim at an influent place.

Although the defendant did not have an intention or ability to pay the amount normally even if he used the card of the victimized person.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and deceivings the victim, one copy of the NongHyup Card in the name of the victim, one modern card, one copy of the modern department store card, and one another.

arrow