The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that at the time of appeal, the Defendant was merely the fact that he was pushed ahead of the back seat of the victim, which was opened to pass by the taxi of the victim. Such an act was a very minor type of action, and at the time, the victim did not appeal for suffering, such as immediately sound, and the victim did not appeal for suffering, and the victim did not appeal for the same, and the victim did not appeal for more than five minutes after the lapse of such action.

Therefore, the victim was injured by the above defendant's act.

shall not be deemed to exist.

Nevertheless, the court below pronounced guilty on the defendant. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, namely, ① the defendant had been aware of the victim's shot on the day of the instant case by witnessing a situation where the victim was parked in the taxi, ② the victim has consistently stated the progress of the instant case from the investigative agency to the court below, the process and contents of the instant case, the defendant's tangible history, and the process before and after the instant case. ③ In particular, according to the records of the video box CD (Evidence Nos. 85 of evidence record) and the records of the recording file corresponding thereto (Evidence No. 75 of evidence record), it appears that the victim complained of the defendant with the evidence that almost after the Defendant's exercise of the above tangible power, and that the victim complained of the defendant about the fact that the victim did not directly leave the medical institution on the day of the instant case, ⑤ Notwithstanding the fact that the victim had received the above investigation on the day of the instant case.