beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 13, 2014, around 22:35, 2014, the Defendant discovered that there is a concern for the Defendant to open the first window for the vehicle operation in the E-Scar owned by the victim D, parked in the south-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and then stolen the Defendant’s money by putting his hand in his car due to such gap and b0,000 won in cash in the vehicle following a year by inserting the car into his hand, and 10,000,000 won in the market price of 230,000,000,000,000,000 won in the market price, including one mobile phone charging machine in the mobile phone of the amount of KRW 10,00,00.
The Defendant continued to use the key that was displayed on a vehicle to drive the said vehicle, but did not make the key known to the said D, which was turned back to the lane, but did not bring the key to the said D.
2. Larceny;
A. On August 12, 2014, at around 02:00, the Defendant discovered that the head window of H-si located in the front road of Busan Northern-gu is opened, and then stolen the car with 60,000 won in cash located in the car after putting the hand in the crepit due to the gap.
B. On September 11, 2014, at around 01:35, the Defendant discovered that there is a window for driving car cars owned by the victim J, which was parked in the I apartment parking lot of the Seo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and then stolen the car with 15,000 won in cash in the car after putting the hand in the crepan, which was located in the car.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of J, D and G Preparation
1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 322 and 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;
1. Among concurrent offenders, it is recognized that the defendant's mistake is divided for the reason of sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.
However, the defendant committed the crime of this case again even if he had had the same criminal record in several times.