Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for three months.
However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. On May 24, 2020, the Defendant: (a) committed indecent act by compulsion on the part of the victim C (V, female, 59 years of age) committed an indecent act by compulsion on the part of the victim, from “E” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, where the victim’s employees work as an employee; (b) placed the victim’s hand on the part of the victim’s bridge between the victim and the victim’s hand; and (c) detained the victim by force.
B. The Defendant’s obstruction of business
At the time and place specified in the port, the victim C interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force for about 20 minutes, such as her b, her b, her b under the influence of alcohol, and her f, her employees who read the defendant.
C. The Defendant damaged public goods at around 14:45 on May 24, 2020.
G in the course of dispatch to the site at the port stated in the port, arrested the defendant as a flagrant offender, and asked him/her into the back seat of H patrol car, which is an official property, the head of the H Patrol room, and asked him/her. At around 15:00 on the same day, he/she was removed from the J District Team located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the suspect waiting seat kin as an infant, and thereby, damaged the repair cost to be KRW 535,000.
2. Defendant B: (a) around 14:45 on May 24, 2020, around 14:45.
At the same place as the statement in the port, “Neman shall engage in any abnormal behavior.” He reported 112 that “Neman shall be confined to the reporter,” and that the G head of N District District of Suwon-gu Police Station affiliated with the J District of Suwon-gu Police Station, who was dispatched to the site, attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender, “Isson arrest, Isson?” The G’s body refers to “Isson arrest, Isar?” and left as his hand the G’s body less than the back and arms.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of report and maintenance of on-site order by police officers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. The police statement concerning G;
1. A written statement prepared by C and F;
1. On-site photographs, the closure photographs of on-site CCTVs, receipts for cost of replacement of glass, the patrol car repair cost, and receipts for cost of replacement of small waves.