The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. According to the judgment, the defendant can be punished for the same kind of crime including seven times of punishment and suspended sentence, and the defendant again commits the crime of this case without being convicted even though he is a repeated crime due to the same kind of crime. The crime of this case is deemed to be appropriate in light of its contents, considering the conditions of various kinds of sentencing as shown in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., including the crime of this case, and various kinds of sentencing conditions and sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court [the two types, such as drug trafficking and good offices, etc., one year and six months from six months to six years from the date of imprisonment with prison labor according to the majority of crimes, and one year and six years to seven years from the date of recommendation and sentence according to the majority of crimes processing standards]. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.