Defendant

The appeal against L/D and the prosecutor's defendant L/B are all dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment of Defendant L and D (Defendant L: 6 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended sentence, 1 year of imprisonment) sentenced by each court below is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence sentenced by the court below (the defendant L: 6 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended execution, 4 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution) is too uneased and unfair.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the Defendants even before the instant case, with the knowledge that the Defendants illegally captured and distributed them for the purpose of sale, and in light of planned and organized criminal acts, etc., the nature of the crime is very poor. The crime of this case, like the instant case, which illegally captured and distributed for the purpose of sale, is inevitable for strict punishment in that it is feared that the destruction of the mincing and mincing species, which are globally endangered species, might be avoided. The total mincing and mincing quantities of the Defendants illegally distributed are the large amount of 1,410 g. Defendant D had the history of being sentenced to three times or more as the same crime even before the instant case. In particular, even after the suspended sentence was sentenced to the Fisheries Act by illegally capturing and capturing them, Defendant D again committed the same crime without being subject to the suspended sentence under the Fisheries Act, and Defendant D’s participation in the instant crime is the most significant amount of Defendant D’s 10k’s punishment without being charged with the remaining mincing evidence.