All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the Defendants to each punishment (one year of imprisonment, confiscation, Defendant B and C: each fine of five million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below reveals that each of the crimes of this case constitutes an international endangered species provided in the Convention on International Trade in the Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITS) with the knowledge that the Defendants illegally captured and captured, purchased, sold, kept, or transported the above mincing mincing minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc minc mins.

The fact that the defendant's wifeO was subject to criminal punishment in 2013 due to the same crime is committed in the instant crime, and that the defendant's wife acquired the passbook, physical card, and password from L, who is an aftermath, from the account of community credit cooperatives in his name, and used it for the management of the sales proceeds of the illegally captured scrapers, is disadvantageous to the defendants.

However, the defendants recognized all of the crimes of this case and against each of the crimes of this case, and the defendant A discontinued cafeterias after the crime of this case and did not repeat again, and all of the defendants are the same.