logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.08.20 2015고단2000
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 00:17, while drinking alcohol at a “C” restaurant located in Daegu Northern-gu B, the Defendant: (b) caused the damage of the portion of paintings stored in the restaurant, and caused the damage of the said portion.

As a result, the reason why the E-district of the Daegu Northern Police Station, which was called out after receiving a report, argued that “If it is confirmed that the restaurant is a place where it sells alcoholic beverages, the restaurant operator will compensate for it,” and accordingly, the restaurant operator had a business registration certificate, and then had it was asked F.

At this time, the Defendant expressed to the F the said F that “I sway, she dried with money,” and threatened the F F with “I am to the face of the F,” and “I am to the end of the F’s face.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of official duties concerning the dispatch of a police officer's report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (two months to one year and four months of imprisonment) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (a person with a special prison labor] [a decision of sentence] [a decision of sentence] The defendant has interfered with the execution of official duties by threatening a cigarette to embars in the face of the police and to see it in mind, and the nature of the crime is not easy.

However, the fact that the defendant's mistake is divided and does not repeat the crime of this case, and the motive, means and result of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the age of the defendant, character and conduct, family environment, etc. are considered, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered by the order.

arrow