The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence (2.5 million won) imposed by the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, and the fact that on September 12, 2013 and June 5, 2015, each of the judgments rendered on September 5, 2015 ought to be considered at the same time as the offense of violation of each of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, is favorable to the Defendant.

However, the instant crime was committed by the Defendant, as a member of the Defendant’s erowawawa, using four times or more a siren contract in the name of B without any kind for the purpose of receiving an allowance from the company, and the nature of the crime is not good. The crime of this case was committed by B, which caused damage to the Defendant’s account to automatically withdraw from his account. In light of the favorable circumstances as seen earlier, the lower court appears to have sentenced the Defendant to the punishment that reduced the fine amount of the instant summary order against the Defendant. In full view of all the sentencing conditions such as Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, etc., the lower court’s sentencing cannot be deemed unfair as it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.