Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On March 31, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) driving the EK3 vehicle from the 15km section to the front road of the D restaurant located in Kimhae-si, which was located on the south side of the west-si without obtaining a driver’s license on March 19, 2016.

B. On March 31, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling from a slope G belonging to the F police box called up after receiving a report that he/she was a drinking driver at the front of a D cafeteria located in Kimhae-si C around March 19:12, 2016, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling alcohol from a slope G to his/her face, raising a redlight.

Even though there are reasonable grounds to determine a person who has been requested to comply with the measurement of drinking by inserting the whole breag in a drinking measuring instrument over about 30 minutes, the defendant did not drive the measuring instrument.

The police officer did not comply with the police officer's request for the measurement of drinking without any justifiable reason after avoiding this.

(c)

On March 31, 2016, at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant was able to drink the alcohol to B who arrive in front of the above D cafeteria, and around 20:00 on March 31, 2016.

I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see the police officer's talk.

upon request of “B,” and caused B to make a false statement to the police officer in charge as if B driven a car of KS3.

As a result, the defendant instigated a person who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment to escape.

2. Defendant B: (a) on March 31, 2016, at around 20:00, the Defendant driven the said K3 car to the police officer in charge as the building of the above A around the above D cafeteria.

A false statement was made.

As a result, the defendant had a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;