logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 01. 11. 선고 2017두60246 판결
(심리불속행)[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2017Nu42677 (2017.08.30)

Title

(Resceptic Conduct)

Summary

The date of donation through a change in the name of the policyholder and the beneficiary of the insurance contract of this case is October 31, 2008, and KRW 1,476,398,672 equivalent to the termination refund calculated according to the terms and conditions of the insurance contract of this case is the most appropriate amount for the property value of the policyholder of the insurance contract of this case and the beneficiary's status as the beneficiary.

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided

Related statutes

31 Scope of donated property under the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

arrow