1. The defendant who ordered the payment of money in excess of the money recognized below among the judgment of the court of first instance on the claim for payment.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 15, 1999, the Defendant acquired the Defendant’s land ownership, etc. 26 persons including C, D, E, F, G, H, H, K, K, L, M, N, P, Q, Q, R, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, and 26 persons (hereinafter collectively referred to as “C, etc.”).

AB together with AB each of the lands listed in Section 1 through 7 of the Schedule of Real Estate listed in Annex AB (hereinafter referred to as “lands 1 through 7”).

(1) Each land set forth in paragraphs 8 and 9 of the same list (hereinafter referred to as “land Nos. 8 and 9”) is referred to as “land” by the sequence thereof.

AB’s shares (1,586/7,930/7,930) were jointly purchased on July 16, 2002, each of which was 5,622/62 of the lands 1 through 7,658.3 shares, and each of which was 8,930/7,930 of the lands 9 and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the defendant for 468/7,930 shares among the lands 9.2) Meanwhile, on February 11, 2000, the defendant filed an application with the head of Sungsung-si under the name of the representative director AC to approve the establishment of a factory on the ground of 29,752 square meters of each land adjacent to the land 1 through 9, and obtained approval for change from the founder of the building permit on June 23, 2001, and obtained approval for change from the AD market.

(b) One defendant, such as the designation and disposition of an industrial complex development project operator, and C, etc. shall be the land and the above;

A. A. (2) Around December 22, 2000, the Plaintiff, an industrial complex outsourced management company, was established for the purpose of implementing an industrial complex development project in one lot of land, such as each land, land, and AI land, as described in paragraph (2). (2) around April 2001, the Plaintiff around April 2001, designated the land 208,632 square meters in the AI as a local industrial complex, and applied for designation of the Plaintiff as a development project operator.

3) As to this, the chemicalization market for the Plaintiff is governed by the Industrial Sites and Development Act (hereinafter “Industrial Sites Act”).

Article 16 and Article 19 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.