logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.02.04 2015노660
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) the Defendant left the scene of the assault by a person without a name or name, and there was no intention to escape; and (b) the degree of injury to the victims of this case is extremely minor and does not constitute

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant did not take measures to rescue victims at the time of the accident in this case and went away from the site on the Do newsletter. The victim D was injured by the 2-day base for the victim D, and the victim E was injured by the climatic salt, tension, etc. (the victim D had an brupted fluorous fluort) due to the accident in this case (the victim D).

The victim E was given a statement, and the victim E was given pharmacologic treatment and physical therapy due to pain.

was stated, and there was extremely minor injury suffered by the victims.

The judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case is just, and the Defendant’s assertion of mistake is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow