The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court affirmed the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the violation of the law by attorney around March 2015, which is the primary charge of the instant facts charged, on the grounds that there is no proof of a crime, and acquitted the Defendant on the fraud, which is the ancillary charge added at the lower court.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the meaning and scope of “handling of legal affairs” under Article 109 Subparag. 1 of the Defense Justice, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.