A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] The Defendant received each summary order of KRW 5 million from Daejeon District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). A fine of KRW 3 million on September 25, 2006, and a fine of KRW 5 million on February 14, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On January 6, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (ex post facto action) and proceeded two-lanes in front of the Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-si, by driving a BKanop vehicle on January 6, 2019.

At the time, the vehicle is proceeding in the first lane, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to see the front, rear, left, and right of the person engaged in driving a motor vehicle, and properly operate the steering and steering devices, thereby changing the course of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went away without immediately stopping the vehicle of the victim so that approximately KRW 323,156 of the repair cost is damaged due to the shock of the vehicle driving by the Defendant, the part on the right side side side side side of the Kazn vehicle driven by the victim D, which was driven by the victim D, due to the negligence of changing the vehicle into one lane as it is, and the Defendant failed to stop the vehicle and take necessary measures.

2. On January 6, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) two or more times, but was under the influence of alcohol at least 0.287% of the blood alcohol concentration without a vehicle driving license on January 15:43, 2019, the Defendant driven B Kannop vehicle in the section of about 5km from the roads near the Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan, Seoan-gu, Seoan, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu to the front way of “G” located in the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A table for a request for appraisal (2019-c-164);

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Written estimate of repair costs;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: Criminal history records (A), Daejeon District Court Decision 2006 High Court Decision 2006 High Court Decision 17646, and Summary Order Assistance to Daejeon District Court Decision 2018 High Court Decision 55 High Court Decision.