logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.02.05 2013가합8065
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay 329,00,000 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from November 26, 2013 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At around 2012, Daelim Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Trlim Industry”) performed oil pipeline installation works in Myanmar, and at the time, the Defendant supplied large forest industry at the time with franchisium as parts to be used on the oil pipeline connections.

B. Since then, the part of the franchise supplied by the Defendant to the Daelim industry is located in the part of the gas lawsuit, which corresponds to the gas lawsuit among the franchise parts, and the part of the gas lawsuit in contact with the gas lawsuit is called gas lawsuit sheet.

In addition, the form of gas bags sold the home on a certain basis through mechanical processing, even among gas calckers, is called "gas calckers".

It was found that the surface is not equal or defective in gas bags (hereinafter only referred to as "gas bags").

C. Accordingly, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Plaintiff on August 2013 (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the terms that the Defendant would pay a total of KRW 175,000,000 for the total sum of 25 minutes by calculating the amount of KRW 7,00,000 per unit of gas bags, while the Defendant’s correction and processing work for the 25 gas bags claim amounting to the Plaintiff.

On August 23, 2013, the Plaintiff commenced the process of revising and processing gas bags, which caused defects, and the Defendant subsequently demanded additional work to the Plaintiff on the ground that the defect occurred, and the Plaintiff completed the process of revising and processing 72 gas bags (the first contract 25 additional instructions) by September 18, 2013.

E. On November 2013, the Defendant paid KRW 175,00,000 to the Plaintiff as remuneration for the first 25 portion of the contract.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, 5 through 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including branch numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

arrow