logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.04.10 2014가단42067
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)

(a) annex.

Reasons

Basic Facts

B. On June 5, 2014, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 350,00 (excluding value-added tax, and subsequent payment), and the lease period of KRW 300,00,000 from June 20, 2014 to June 20, 2016, and delivered the Plaintiff four stories. (b) The Defendant entered into the lease agreement with the Plaintiff on the same day, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 6 (hereinafter referred to as “six stories”), KRW 20,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 300,000 (hereinafter referred to as “the lease period”) among the instant building, which is owned by the Defendant. The Defendant entered into the lease agreement with the Plaintiff on the same day.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap 1, 2, Eul 1-1, and 1-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff's claim for judgment as to the main claim of this case is as follows.

The Plaintiff leased 4 and 6 floors from the Defendant for the purpose of promoting the unmanned receipt business for direct trade in agricultural products.

On June 23, 2014, the Plaintiff was handed over to the fourth floor and began to engage in the recruitment of employees.

In consideration of the Plaintiff’s insufficient financial situation, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to suspend the payment of KRW 15 million out of the lease deposit by the end of October 2014, but to increase the monthly rent to KRW 4 million (excluding value-added tax).

However, on July 31, 2014, the Defendant did not deliver the 6th floor to the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Plaintiff was unable to move into the 6th floor office. As a result, the above unmanned stacking business was no longer added, and the Plaintiff’s 4th floor office work cost, personnel expenses, etc. are all included.

arrow