logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.11.26 2014구단15163
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On February 1, 2007, the Plaintiff is a person who served as a teacher of a school site in teachers' clubs Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "instant company") and served as a teacher of a school site.

On May 22, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care approval for the instant injury and disease on the ground that the Plaintiff’s work constituted “the instant injury and disease,” claiming that knee-fee-fee-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe

【Ground of recognition” without any dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 3, and the purport of the entire argument as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case, the plaintiff asserted that the disposition of this case is legitimate, thereby suffering from a heavy burden on the members, i.e., taking a teaching material with an average of about 12.5 kilograms per day after becoming a member of the company of this case, visiting the members’ house and taking a course.

In addition, around March 201, the elevator with 208 Bolar apartment located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, caused the breakdown, and the plaintiff only left at least 3 weeks of stairs over 10 stories, and in this process, the plaintiff was more liable for knee and eventually the injury of this case occurred.

As such, the Plaintiff’s injury and disease of this case returned to the main office of a day, and it was caused by the Plaintiff’s work that must take the stairs, but the Defendant’s disposition that did not recognize the proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s work and the main office of this case is unlawful.

Facts of recognition

The plaintiff's working environment was employed for five days a week by joining the company of this case, and the daily working hours were from 10:00 to 23:00.

The plaintiff goes to work 10:00 and visited 10 to 11 households per day after he has become equipped with teaching materials and documents, and continues to take lessons once.

arrow