beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 7, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Gwangju District Court's Maritime District Court's Maritime Branch on February 13, 2018, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.
1. Around June 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) had no intent or ability to pay the compensation to the victim B with respect to the victim C, D, and B with falling intellectual ability; (b) had induced the victim to open his/her cell phone; and (c) had solicited the victim to open his/her cell phone in the name of the victim; and (d) received and disposed of the same.
Around June 27, 2016, the Defendant and C/D obtained 6S flussium 1 and 968,000,000 from the victim on the same day, and acquired 7 so-called so-called flusium 7 so-called so-called a so-called flusium jusium 3,00,000 won in the market price opened on the same day from the victim, on the part of the victim, to the victim as a mobile phone store in front of the E hotel in front of the E hotel in which the victim was caught or prepared in advance."
2. On March 2017, the Defendant and H, at the H’s house located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, on the following occasions: (a) In fact, the Defendant and H did not have an intent or ability to pay the installment amount even if they leased the victim G’s name to the extent that they could not purchase a vehicle with a low credit rating and without a certain import; (b) the Defendant and H did not have an intent or ability to pay the installment amount; (c) the Defendant and H made the victim use the name to sell the vehicle in the name of the victim’s G through J Mesen to the effect that “the Defendant will transfer the vehicle to H after three months.” The Defendant and H received a loan of KRW 12 million from the victim around the 27th of the same month, and received it.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with H, obtained a vehicle of 12 million won at the market price from the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant and H.