The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one hundred months of imprisonment and a fine of 600,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is recognized in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the Defendant’s health; (b) the mother’s health status is not good; and (c) the Defendant’s family member, and his son wanting to take the Defendant’s wife.

However, each of the crimes of this case was committed by the police officers who were engaged in performing their duties by finding the defendant at the police box, and they interfere with the performance of duties by the police officers by gathering panty disease or spanty and anti-spanty booms where the police officers ask him, and assaulting the police officers, and thereby obstructing the performance of duties by the police officers, and the defendant has avoided the disturbance at the government office, and the defendant has damaged the identification certificate of the flagrant offender and the physical confirmation certificate of the flagrant offender who is a public document in the process of the crime of this case. In light of the law and the result of the crime of this case, the number of the victimized police officers (five persons), the degree of interference with the execution of official duties (at least three hours in total by the defendant, it seems that the police officer interfered with the performance of duties as stated in the crime of this case) and the extent of interference with the execution of duties (at least four hours in total with the defendant's request for strict punishment for the defendant, the records of the crime of this case and the sentencing guidelines of this case, etc.

1. First category of the obstruction of performance of official duties (in case where there are many public officials who have suffered damage, and the degree of the obstruction of official duties is serious) and one year to six years.