logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.11.22 2017구합83379
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. On August 23, 2017, the Defendant’s disposition of bereaved family benefits and funeral expense against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s spouse B (CB, hereinafter “the deceased”) served as a mining source at D Mining Center from January 1, 1986 to March 20, 1989.

As a result of the diagnosis period of 0. 1: F. 2. 0: 08. 2. 0: 0. 2. 1 to 16. 1:00 on March 1, 1996 ( Normal) 2. 1/10 on May 2, 1997; 1/2. 0 on June 1, 1997; 0. 1/6. 0 on May 7, 1998; 0. 2. 1/6 on June 2, 200 on June 8, 200 to 3. 1. 2. 0 on June 1, 200 on June 8, 1998; 2. 1/20 on June 13, 201 on June 19, 200 to 3. 2. 1/6. 20 on May 19, 201

B. The result of the previous precise diagnosis of the deceased is as follows.

C. On June 27, 2017, the Deceased was hospitalized in the KLAWD Hospital (hereinafter “Tagsan Hospital”) due to pneumoconiosis, and died around 19:15.

The death diagnosis of the deceased is written as a direct death and an intermediate exercise agent, with pneumoconiosis symptoms and pneody, and with pneumoconiosis symptoms as a prior death agent.

On July 4, 2017, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to pay bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses.

On August 23, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition of the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral’s site pay-off disposition on the ground that “The deceased, who was engaged in dusty work in the past, sought medical advice (two times) from the Defendant’s advisory doctor along with relevant materials on the cause of death, and that “the cause of death and the symptoms of pneumoconiosis, which are approved as diseases, are considered to be low in relation thereto.”

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [The ground for recognition] does not dispute;

arrow