logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.11.12 2019구합83618
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

B (C) from October 10, 1972 to December 30, 1984, and from June 3, 1987 to February 1, 1992, D Co., Ltd. worked as mining source and engaged in dusty work.

B B as a result of the close examination as follows: B B-based non-activity-pulmonary tuberculosis, tba: E-based pulmonary tuberculosis from May 10, 2012, and hospitalized in E- Hospital.

As a result of the diagnosis of the diagnosis date, on September 16, 2002 as a result of the determination of the cardiopulmonary function of chest radiation images, the disability grade 1/0 of the E Hospital on September 16, 2002 - on February 4, 2004, the E Hospital 1/0tbbb F0 (normal) disability 1/0 of the E Hospital on September 8, 2006, class 13, class 13, class 13, class 1/0 of the E Hospital 1/0 Tbbbbbb F0 (ordinary) disability on January 7, 2008, class 13, class 1/0 of the E Hospital 1/0 Tbbbbbbbbf0 (ordinary) disability on August 4, 2009, class 7, class 1/0 B was hospitalized for a long time on October 1/13, 2012.

The plaintiff is the spouse of B (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”).

On October 18, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition to pay survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses to the Plaintiff on the ground that “the deceased died due to pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary Spon.

(hereinafter "Disposition in this case"). 【No dispute exists, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings are as shown in the attached Form of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes.

In full view of the following facts and circumstances revealed by the purport of the entire pleadings, the evidence revealed prior to the legitimacy of the instant disposition, the fact-finding inquiry report to E Hospital, the F Hospital, and G Hospital, as a result of each request for the appraisal of medical records, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to deem the deceased’s death as a result of pneumoconiosis, and any other evidence to acknowledge the death otherwise.

arrow