logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013. 04. 18. 선고 2012나41820 판결
채권양도가 사해행위에 해당한다고 하더라도 소로써 이에 대한 취소를 구하는 외에 이를 항변으로 주장할 수는 없음[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan District Court Branch 2012Gadan204176 ( March 31, 2012)

Title

Even if the assignment of claims constitutes a fraudulent act, it shall not be asserted as a defense in addition to seeking revocation thereof by means of a lawsuit.

Summary

Even if the assignment of each claim between the plaintiff and the defendant constitutes a fraudulent act, it cannot be asserted as a defense except seeking revocation by lawsuit.

Cases

2012Na41820 Confirmation of Claim for Payment of Deposit

Plaintiff, Appellant

AAAAA

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Korea

Judgment of the first instance court

Busan District Court Decision 2012Gadan204176 Decided August 31, 2012

Conclusion of Pleadings

February 28, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

April 18, 2013

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

A. On December 31, 2010, between the Plaintiff and the first instance trial codefendant BB Seoul,CC Design Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., D, EE Bank, GG Fund, HH, and II Bank, and the Defendant, J Industry Co., Ltd., 900 won deposited by the Seoul Central District Court No. 26953, May 13, 201, and each claim for the withdrawal of deposit amount against 000 won deposited by the Seoul Central District Court No. 9402, May 13, 2011, is confirmed to be against the Plaintiff.

B. On December 30, 2010, the Plaintiff and the first instance court confirmed that the deposit withdrawal claim for KRW 39,223,10, which was deposited by the Seoul Central District Court No. 26820 on December 30, 2010 between the Plaintiff, the Seoul Central District Court, theCC Design Co., Ltd, the OOO, and the Defendant was the Plaintiff.

2. Purport of appeal

In the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revocation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

The reasoning of this Court's reasoning is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit

arrow