logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.01.17 2016고단837
업무상과실치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as an employee of “F” company F in Busan City, was in charge of the part form presses to pay fuel cell plates from an automobile hydrogen fuel cell plate in a press machine, and the victim G (the age of 42) was originally in charge of the inspection of the cell board at the above vehicle fuel cell plate, but he was in charge of the inspection of the cell board at the above vehicle fuel cell plate, but he was in charge of the operation of the press room with the part form presses by moving the cell board to the press room according to the company circumstances.

On November 19, 2014, at around 08:30, the Defendant carried out the shape of the Defendant’s 1st floor automobile of “F” and the part of the Defendant’s fuel cell plate affixed with the press machine around the 1st place of work, and the victim was engaged in the same work in the press machine of 3rd presses.

In the case of the part shape work using press machines, there is a possibility that the body of workers may inflict an accident between press machines. As such, the Defendant, who is in charge of the dangerous press system, has a duty of care to prevent an accident in advance by thoroughly examining the following: (a) whether there is an existing work worker in the press machine before the press machine operation pressing; (b) if there is an existing work worker; and (c) if there is an existing work worker; and (d) whether the license in the safety device works properly, has a duty of care to prevent an accident that causes bodily injury in the press machine.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and applied the press machine operation method to the victim on the same day at around 09:32, and in the future, the victim’s hand, etc. was cut out of the press machine, without properly checking whether the victim’s hand, etc. was completely broken out of the press machine, and then the victim’s hand was forced into the press machine board.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence to the victim by saving the right and receiving the water.

arrow