A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 4, 2019, the Defendant issued a proposal to the effect that “A, a transaction performance is available if he/she sets up a transaction performance,” so that he/she can obtain a loan by getting the loan. If he/she is notified of the party’s account number, he/she sought the money in the name of his/her own denied name and the name of his/her branch and then requested to deliver it directly to our employees.” Upon receipt of the proposal to the effect that “The bank account number (E) in the name of the Defendant’s bank account in order to obtain a loan promising to be promised by the non-member of his/her name was known.”

1. On March 12, 2019, the name-free person, who received the account number in the name of the Defendant as above, in committing a crime against the victim F, falsely called “a bank employee by phone call to the victim F, and “a bank employee may, upon repayment after obtaining the H card loan, obtain government support Mappbook loan whose credit score is raised,” and falsely called “a bank loan may be repaid in the name of the first employee A.”

However, the person who was not a member of the G bank was not a member of the G bank, and there was no intention or ability to allow the above victim to get government-funded M&S loans.

On March 12, 2019, at around 11:41, 201, the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under consideration was not paid was remitted KRW 10 million from the above victim to the above bank account under the name of the defendant, and then ordered the defendant to withdraw and deliver the amount of KRW 9.8 million out of the above KRW 10 million, and the defendant knew that the person under whose name the person under consideration was not paid was guilty of fraud as above, and then withdrawn KRW 9.8 million from the central office in the Seo-gu Daejeon District of Daejeon, Daejeon, and delivered it to the person who sent the person under whose name the person under consideration was not paid.

Accordingly, the Defendant made it easy to commit the above fraud by the employees of the above name thrishing operations.

2. On March 12, 2019, the name in whose case the account number in the name was transmitted to the victim K, as stated in the crime committed against the victim K, shall be phoneed to the victim K and an employee of G bank.