logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.01.17 2017고단3175
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 8, 2017, the defrauded: (a) around 23:00, the Defendant: (b) acted as if the victim C would normally pay the amount; and (c) ordered the two shares to E, an employee of the victim, etc.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if he received the alcohol from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) was provided with alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 920,000, such as Bluos 3 C, and female helpers services; and (c) did not pay the amount, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the said amount.

2. On August 9, 2017, the Defendant was urged to pay the alcohol value and return home from the victim G, who is the circumstances leading up to the F District in the Mine Police Station F District and called out after receiving a report of 112 on August 9, 2017.

Accordingly, while the Defendant’s three employees H et al. of the above singing are observed by three persons, the Defendant: “I am Maz, Maz, I am Maz, I am Maz, and I am Maz, I am Maz, I am Maz.

The victim openly insultingd the victim by referring to “Irreging”.

3. On August 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender due to the offense of insult, such as paragraph (2) in front of B building in light of around 03:50 on August 9, 2017; and (b) was arrested to board the patrol vehicle to escort.

피고인은 순찰차 뒷좌석에서 현행범인 체포에 대하여 불만을 품고 소란을 피우던 중, 피고인을 호송하기 위해 옆자리에 동승하고 있던 광명 경찰서 F 지구대 소속 순경 I으로부터 제지를 당하게 되자, 위 I에게 " 씨 발 놈 아 내가 뭘 잘못했는데 체포를 해, 다 죽어 볼래

"I take a bath and take a left hand at one time to the right face of the I.I.D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the escort of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The defendant;

arrow