1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 14, 2013, the circumstances of the instant accident revealing A around 22:35 B SM3 Passenger Vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), driving the vehicle, and driving the vehicle in front of the central border railroad station 15-10 U.S. government dong 15-Gu, in the middle of the two-lanes from the police station shooting distance to the port of Scheon-ro, in two-lanes, the two-lanes of the vehicle in front of the C driver’s Dusscar (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) moving by righting from the center of the government toward the center of 30 to 40 meters two-lanes, leading to the death of the vehicle in front of the E driver’s vehicle (hereinafter “victim’s vehicle”) while driving the vehicle in one-lane way again, resulting in the death of the two-lane vehicle in front of the central border. The part of the E driver’s vehicle in front of the two-lane vehicle in front of the two-lane vehicle in front of the central border.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

The Plaintiff paid KRW 215,650,020 to the victims of the damaged vehicle, as the insurer who entered into the comprehensive automobile insurance contract with A as the insured.

[Ground of Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 3-1, 4-1 through 15, Gap evidence 5-1 through 6, Gap evidence 7-1 through 7, Gap evidence 11-1 through 7, Eul evidence 1-2-3 through 72, Eul evidence 3-1 through 3-9, Eul evidence 3-1 through 72, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant’s vehicle carried the accident site rapidly without complying with the direction, etc., and entered the two-lanes and caused the instant accident. The Defendant, the insurer who entered the comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant, is the insurer who entered the instant vehicle.