beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 13, 2018, the Defendant was the spouse of F, who was married as a candidate for the E party belonging to the next City constituency in the election of a member of the next City Council in the following City, from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, the Defendant was a member of the next City Council (the term of office from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018).
A National Assembly member, a local council member, the head of a local government, the representative of a political party, a candidate (including a person intending to become a candidate) and his/her spouse shall not make contributions to persons in the constituency concerned, or institutions, organizations, facilities, or any other persons having relations with a resident in the constituency concerned, or institutions, organizations, or facilities even if they are outside the Gu concerned.
Nevertheless, the defendant around 09:00 on January 20, 2018 and around 09:0, the defendant issued a request to He in front of H, a resident of the D constituency in the Hasan-si, the election district in the Hasan-si.
At this time, us have the honor of rice.
“C Rice” 10 km equivalent to the market value of 25,000 won.
Accordingly, the defendant, even though he is a spouse of a member of the local council, made a contribution amounting to 25,000 won.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to H;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to I;
1. A protocol of seizure of persons on January 29, 2018 and a list of seizure;
1. Two copies of CCTV images;
1. The Defendant and his defense counsel stated that “The Defendant and his defense counsel acknowledged the facts charged of this case at the trial date and asked H to the election of the head of the Tong at the time of the trial.” The Defendant and his defense counsel accepted the meaning that H did not go to the Defendant and only her rice for the purpose of drinking rice, and that H did not request F to go to the election of the head of the Tong at the time of the trial date. It did not mean that H did not request F to go to the effect that H would well request F to go to go to the local election.”
Therefore, this Court is legitimate.