beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, the 2012 Highest 2608 Case No. 1-b.
(1) Imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of subsection (1).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant A was sentenced to a fine of one million won at the Suwon District Court on September 17, 2012, and the same criminal records are more than six times more than six times, and Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny on January 18, 2011 at Ansan Branch of the Suwon District Court on the 26th of the same month, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 26th of the same month.
5. On November 14, 2012, when the execution of the sentence was terminated by a training and vocational training prison, the sentence was being executed in the training and vocational training prison as of November 22, 2012, when the judgment became final and conclusive on November 22, 2012.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A and B;
A. On March 2012, the Defendants: (a) in collusion with F and a person with influence in name; (b) in the “I restaurant” operated by the victim H in Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si; (c) in fact, they did not have the intent or ability to normally pay the price even if they were provided with alcohol and food from the victim; and (d) the Defendants, who ordered the victim’s drinking, food, etc. and received food, etc. of an amount equivalent to KRW 40,000 at the market price from the victim’s place; and (b) from that time, they received food, etc. of KRW 173,000 in total, four times as indicated in the attached Table 1, from the victims, from that time until June 2012, 200.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to induce victims to take the property by deceiving them.
B. On June 2010, the Defendants, together with F, put up a brupt increase by stating that “When the victim’s K (Woo, 30 years of age) was demanded to pay KRW 7,000 won to the victim, the victim is not aware of the inside who is the victim, and both the head of the Si/Gun/Gu are cut off.”
The defendants have the victim of food, which is hot, claim the above value of food.