A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person who was acting for the chairperson of the tenant representative council of the Nam-gu apartment housing C at port.

No person who processes or has processed personal information shall divulge personal information he/she has become aware of in the course of performing his/her duties.

Nevertheless, on August 30, 2017, the Defendant received questioning from the victim D about the fact that the representative of the above apartment building was asked from the victim D about the unlawful use of the reserve fund, and had the employees of the above apartment management office posted the notice of the result of the tenant representative meeting stating the victim's name and domicile on the above apartment bulletin board around August 31, 2017.

In this respect, the defendant disclosed the victim's personal information that he became aware of in the course of his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and D;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including the part concerning the statement of the E);

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. The filing of a complaint, the proposal of the agenda of the representative meeting of occupants on August 30, 2017, and the announcement of the results of the representative meeting of occupants;

1. Public announcement of the results of a representative meeting of occupants to be submitted and copies of the minutes;

1. The defendant asserts that the content of the Kakao Stockholm conversation (64 to 70 pages of investigation records), minutes (the 89,90 pages of investigation records), the Kakao Stockholm dialogue data (the Kakao Stockholm data (the 90 to 105 pages of investigation records) [the defendant and the defense counsel did not divulge the victim's personal information under the direction of the defendant E, and the subject of posting a notice of the result of the tenant representative meeting is the chief management officer E, so the defendant cannot be the subject of the leakage of personal information.

First, we examine the first argument of the defendant and his defense counsel.

According to each of the above evidences duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim's name and address is given to E, the chief executive officer, and the result of the resident representative meeting.