Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 26, 2008, the Defendant was punished by a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Busan District Court on December 26, 2008, and a fine of one million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Jung-gu District Court on March 31, 201.

On December 17, 2017, around 23:05, the Defendant driven a vehicle Eben S350 in the state of alcohol with approximately 6 km alcohol concentration of about 0.10% in blood from the main point of “C” located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the front road of Ku Government-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Report on the situation of driving in the main place, report on the situation of the driver in the main place, report on each investigation (related to the situation report of the driver in the main place, CCTV image data), notification of the results of the crackdown on driving in drinking, notification of the department related to the report in the case of each 112, inquiry into the results of the crackdown on driving in drinking, inquiry into the fact of the crackdown on driving in drinking, making inquiries into the following, making inquiries into the field map, picture of the scene, photograph of the CCTV image in the case, photograph of the photograph of the screen screen in the case, photograph of the screen

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the issue of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in relation to the provisional payment order was judged by the defendant and his defense counsel, and that the defendant did not drive a vehicle under the influence of alcohol as stated in the facts charged in this case.

On the other hand, the following circumstances, which were duly adopted and examined by this Court, i.e., the E-V. on the day of the instant case, was parked in the four-lanes of the front road of the Gu Government City on the day of the instant case, and on the same day, around 22:55 on the same day, there was a person driving on the fourth-lane road.

Vehicles stop.

The 112 declaration "the accident is the same as the accident is being stopped on the last line of the road at around 22:59 on the same day."